By Topic By Date Reply Class Web

Previous Next

[AMath 383] HW #5 Hints



There have been a few questions about determining the infection rate 
parameter beta for problem #1. I want to make a few comments about this.

Some of you have correctly determined that the model will grow 
approximately exponentially near N=0. Ignoring the recovery rate 
momentarily, you might want to estimate dI/dt=beta S I (but with 
S=N-I), and then find the linear approximation for I near 0. This will 
yield one approach to estimating beta.

Another approach that I originally anticipated people to use was to use 
a similar approach to our estimates of per capita birth and death 
rates. When the number of infected individuals are small, each infected 
individual will give rise to an average of 10 new infecteds in a day. 
So, how would we mathematically get the per capita infection rate from 
the formula? (This is like a birth rate for the infecteds, or could be 
thought of as a death rate for the susceptibles.)

The second approach gives an estimate that will be larger than the 
first approach. Essentially, this arises from the fact that the 
exponential growth model assumes that each individual that becomes 
infected has part of the day under consideration to infect others. But 
the second approach neglects these secondary infections. The 
exponential growth approach (first) leads to a smaller estimate of the 
rate because the burden of infecting is shared with early contacts. But 
the second approach requires each individual to account for the full 10 
new infecteds, leading to a higher rate estimate.

Best wishes,

D. Brian Walton
AMath 383 Instructor
Guggenheim 408C
(206) 685-9298